So-called ‘Terror Watchlist’ Gun Ban Poses Greatest Danger of Any Current Proposal

So-called ‘Terror Watchlist’ Gun Ban Poses Greatest Danger of Any Current Proposal

So-called ‘Terror Watchlist’ Gun Ban Poses Greatest Danger of Any Current Proposal

“Right now, people on the No-Fly list can walk into a store and buy a gun,” Barack Obama told the country as he attempted to find a scapegoat for his Homeland Security Department totally blowing letting the “better half” of the San Bernardino terror tag team into the country. “That is insane.

“If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun,” Obama explained, continuing with misdirection about killer “motives” and setting the stage, naturally, for further infringements of the Second Amendment.  “And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now.”

That “loophole” is a pesky thing called “due process,” and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty due every American.  As for foreigners, if they’re too dangerous to let on a plane, what’s insane is allowing them to be here moving freely among us in the first place.

But, following “progressive” Opposite Day “logic,” if we assume Obama actually believes it, anyone who opposes him on this is insane. No problem, he’s got that group slated for a federal gun prohibition, too. And yes, of course without full legal protections for the accused equivalent to a jury trial.

So if he suspects you’re a terrorist, and no, he’s not going to tell you how and why, because that’s a secret, too bad.

Naturally, the “crusading watchdog media” is beside itself with tail-thumping ecstasy at the prospect of master being pleased. Veteran political blood dancers, like Connecticut Gov. Dannell Malloy, can’t wait to start in with dictated prohibitions and confiscations. Ditto for ambitious New York State Senator Jeff Klein (may we assume, as the failed Sheldon Silver defense maintained, that he, like all NY politicians, is corrupt?).  Neither has seen fit to mention the overwhelming noncompliance with existing Intolerable Acts in their respective states, and how adding another unconstitutional edict that invites mass defiance will impact any but those inclined to obey out of fear.